Log in

No account? Create an account
entries friends calendar profile My Website Previous Previous Next Next
Mark Atwood
A really odd way to build a new model of economic action...

As soon as fMRIs are super cheap, here is one way they can change things:

A research team at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) recently conducted anexperiment in which a group of volunteers were offered an abstract public good. The price for the public good was fixed, but each group member would benefit differently from it. So how do you determine how much each person should pay? In this experiment, the researchers scanned the volunteers' brains using functional magnetic resonance imaging as the volunteers stated how much they were willing to pay. The researchers analyzed the fMRI images to obtain information about how much the person really valued having the public good, and then compared it with how much they were willing to pay for it.

The kicker was that volunteers whose measured value closely matched the amount they were willing to pay were charged less than people whose fMRI value was higher than the amount they were willing to pay. In other words, the folks who lied about how much the public good was worth to them were penalized by having to pay more than the people who told the truth about how much they valued the public good. As Caltech graduate student Ian Krajbich, who co-wrote the paper about the experiment for the online edition of the journalScience, put it, "The rules of the experiment are such that if you tell the truth your expected tax will never exceed your benefit from the good."

It didn't take many iterations for the volunteers to learn that honesty was the best policy, at least in this laboratory. The researchers said that once volunteers understood the penalty for lying, they told the truth 98 percent of the time.

As far as I'm concerned, the age-old free rider problem has been solved. Now all I need to do is drag my free riding neighbors into the nearest brain scanning center and make them pay up.

4 comments or Leave a comment
lishablog From: lishablog Date: September 30th, 2009 10:32 am (UTC) (Link)
ummm... that's nice for technology and science, but really icky for society. Can anyone say, "Thought Police"?

If something like this were used in real life, the problems it would create would be as big -- maybe worse -- than the problems it would solve, I think.
sinanju From: sinanju Date: September 30th, 2009 03:52 pm (UTC) (Link)
I agree, but we've been moving toward that endpoint for a while. fMRI is just the start. The more we figure out about the actual workings of the mind, the more we're going to start being able to SEE people thinking. Which means, inevitably, being able to know--not just guess, but KNOW--when they're lying, or telling the truth, when they're actually remembering and when they're making stuff up.

Scary stuff.
fallenpegasus From: fallenpegasus Date: September 30th, 2009 09:31 pm (UTC) (Link)
fallenpegasus From: fallenpegasus Date: September 30th, 2009 09:31 pm (UTC) (Link)
4 comments or Leave a comment